Jun 282024
 

Retailers are actively exploring and deploying facial recognition and analysis as part of their security and loss-prevention strategies to safeguard their customers and employees, margins and profitability. Corsight AI provides both face biometrics and computer vision analytics, and has a major new client to showcase its capabilities. Mall of America (MOA) has integrated facial recognition into its security infrastructure, joining forces with Corsight AI to implement its facial recognition system, which MOA lauds for its high accuracy, reliability, and privacy protection. There have been several firearms incidents at MOA over the past several years. The biometric system identifies Persons of Interest (POIs), including banned individuals or those trespassing at the mall, people who may pose…

External feed Read More at the Source: https://www.biometricupdate.com/202406/mall-of-america-deploys-corsight-facial-recognition-after-gun-incidents

 2024-06-28  Comments Off on Biometric Update – Mall of America deploys Corsight facial recognition after gun incidents
Jun 282024
 

Well, we’ll see how long ShotSpotter/SoundThinking will keep making that New York money. The outlook is not good. A lot of this will depend on how well the NYPD can defend the useless product it’s spending millions on, but at the end of the day, the city still holds the purse strings and it has the power to terminate contracts that simply aren’t worth paying for.
The NYC comptroller performed an audit of the NYPD and ShotSpotter not with the intent of burying them, but simply to determine whether or not the NYPD was paying its bills on time and whether or not ShotSpotter was fulfilling the obligations of its contract.
The answer to both questions…

External feed Read More at the Source: https://www.techdirt.com/2024/06/27/nyc-comptroller-report-says-shotspotter-is-just-wasted-money/

 2024-06-28  Comments Off on Techdirt. – NYC Comptroller Report Says ShotSpotter Is Just Wasted Money
Jun 282024
 

Today, the Supreme Court declined to issue a ruling in Idaho and Moyle, et al. v. United States. Instead, it sent the case back down to the lower courts where anti-abortion extremists will continue to fight to strip pregnant people of the basic right to emergency care, including when their life is at risk.
While the court’s decision temporarily restores the ability of doctors in Idaho to provide emergency abortions required under the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act —EMTALA— by dismissing the case without affirming once and for all that pregnant people have a right to the emergency abortion care they need to protect their health and lives, the court continues to put pregnant patients…

External feed Read More at the Source: https://www.aclu.org/news/reproductive-freedom/the-supreme-court-just-declined-to-protect-emergency-abortion-care-for-pregnant-patients-heres-what-to-know

 2024-06-28  Comments Off on American Civil Liberties Union – The Supreme Court Just Declined to Protect Emergency Abortion Care for Pregnant Patients. Here’s What to Know