Mar 052024
 

The leader in gunshot detection tech rebranded recently. Following several months of sustained negative press, ShotSpotter decided it wanted to be called something else: SoundThinking.
But a raffelesia by any other name smells the same. ShotSpotter had experienced a bit of quick uptake by law enforcement agencies, but in recent years, it was more well-known for having contracts terminated by major cities, allegedly altering data to better fit police report narratives, and suing reporters for covering nothing more than allegations made against the company in court.
No one’s going to stop calling ShotSpotter by its original Christian name. SoundThinking may be the new brand, but if anyone wants readers to instantly understand the tech being discussed, ShotSpotter…

External feed Read More at the Source: https://www.techdirt.com/2024/03/04/leaked-data-details-the-reach-and-breadth-of-shotspotters-gunshot-detection-systems/

 2024-03-05  Comments Off on Techdirt. – Leaked Data Details The Reach And Breadth Of ShotSpotter’s Gunshot Detection Systems
Mar 052024
 

Enlarge / A car’s hazard warning lights will need a physical control to get a five-star EuroNCAP score in 2026.
Some progress in the automotive industry is laudable. Cars are safer than ever and more efficient, too. But there are other changes we’d happily leave by the side of the road. That glossy “piano black” trim that’s been overused the last few years, for starters. And the industry’s overreliance on touchscreens for functions that used to be discrete controls. Well, the automotive safety organization European New Car Assessment Programme (Euro NCAP) feels the same way about that last one, and it says the controls ought to change in 2026.
“The overuse of touchscreens…

External feed Read More at the Source: https://arstechnica.com/?p=2007776

 2024-03-05  Comments Off on Ars Technica – European crash tester says carmakers must bring back physical controls
Mar 052024
 

San Francisco’s ballot initiative Proposition E is a dangerous and deceptive measure that threatens our privacy, safety, and democratic ideals. It would give the police more power to surveil, chase, and harm. It would allow the police to secretly acquire and use unproven surveillance technologies for a year or more without oversight, eliminating the hard-won protections backed by a majority of San Franciscans that are currently in place. Prop E is not a solution to the city’s challenges, but rather a threat to our rights and freedoms. 
Don’t be fooled by the misleading arguments of Prop E’s supporters. A group of tech billionaires have contributed a small fortune to convince San Francisco voters that they would be safer…

External feed Read More at the Source: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/03/voting-no-prop-e-easy-and-important-san-francisco

 2024-03-05  Comments Off on Deeplinks – Voting No on Prop E Is Easy and Important for San Francisco