Jun 042024
 

Kind of an odd bit of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence here, given all the factors. (h/t FourthAmendment.com)
Obviously, some conversations have an expectation of privacy, even when they’re held in police interrogation rooms. Those would be ones between the suspect and their legal representation. But that’s not really a Fourth Amendment issue as it is about privileged communications. The government isn’t allowed to eavesdrop on suspects as they work on a legal defense and/or make statements to their lawyer.
Then there’s the assumption that pretty much everything a cop would like to listen to is recorded, starting with anything said in interrogation rooms (minus attorney-client communications) and ending with phone calls placed from jail phones. (On the other hand,…

External feed Read More at the Source: https://www.techdirt.com/2024/06/03/state-court-says-theres-a-reasonable-expectation-of-privacy-in-conversations-with-non-cops-in-interrogation-rooms/

 2024-06-04

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.